The Colombian Catholic Church: cover-up, scandals and intolerance

By Julián Ortega Martínez
17 January 2007 19:01 COT
Filed under:

This is an article which didn’t make it at The Canadian

Pedro Rubiano SáenzAs in every Spanish-speaking country, the Catholic Church still holds a lot of power in society, no matter if Catholicism is no longer the "official religion". It does not mean that society still believes everything the Church states, though it is still trusted by public, institutionally speaking.

Recent controversies have put the power of the Church to the test in Colombia. In May 2006, the Constitutional Court lifted partially the ban on abortion in three specific cases, after a controversy that took more than a year, where the clergy failed to convince the public that abortion was a murder, no matter the circumstance. The reaction of the Church to the ruling was to excommunicate the judges who voted in favour of the verdict. It did the same when the first public legal abortion, to a 11-year-old girl who was raped by her stepfather, was performed: the doctors who practiced the operation, the girl and her grandmother were excommunicated by Alfonso López Trujillo, president of the Pontifical Council for the Family. The rapist was not punished or even mentioned by the Church. Paramilitaries or guerrillas, who have killed, displaced, raped and abused thousands of people, are not excommunicated either.

More recently, sexual abuse scandals have reached the media and caused outrage. As usually occurs, specially since the BBC documentary about the Crimen sollicitationis secret document was broadcasted, Church chooses to cover-up. Father Efraín Rozo confessed in a video his child molestations, committed in the 1960s, as part of a process in a court of Los Angeles. The victims claim they had to go to the American justice, because in Colombia crimes against children prescribe within 20 years. But, after one week silent, cardinal Pedro Rubiano, archbishop of Bogotá, reacted against the evidence instead of facing the issue, claiming that the former was "false", the video, shown by the media late September, was "manipulated", and the plaintiffs, the people abused by Rozo and another two priests, were looking for money. Then, Rubiano insulted a journalist, telling him: "don’t you have any brains, man?".

Rubiano was the same man who in a September 2006 interview asked for "tolerance" from civil society to the Church, besides of criticizing the "omnipotency" of the Constitutional Court and denying Church leaders alleged involvement with drug lords. The Rozo case happens just when the Congress discuss the increase for the sentences against child abusers, but no one of the congresspeople who asked for life imprisonment or the ones known for "defending" children, as Gina Parody, have said a word about the scandal.

When liberals (the few ones who dare in a right-wing administration) deal with issues like abortion or gay rights, the Colombian Church cries out and its position is listened. But when the churchmen are the criminals, they want us to shut up. Or be insulted, as the journalist Rubiano shouted at. And we are really getting tired of it.

They look so cute…

By Julián Ortega Martínez
24 August 2006 20:13 COT
Filed under:

Carlos Mario Jiménez y Rodrigo Pérez Alzate

Oh, they’re so nice… cleaning their "confinement site"

Ernesto Báez

Oh, look, these guy used to kill children using a power saw… and last week he asked for a new "Justice and peace law", because the original one was too "severe".

Salvatore Mancuso

This other fellow is such a "national hero"… so "respectful of the president and the promises we made to Colombia", as he said… while a lot of common graves are ungrounded (why didn’t he sweep them?), these guy will just spend 5 or 6 years in jail, after killing hundreds of people…

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES

MURDERERS, KILLERS, AWARDED FOR THEIR CRIMES BY PRESIDENT ÁLVARO URIBE (who is so "brave"…)

COLOMBIA HATES YOU ALL!!! F*CK U!!!

Sow hate and grudge, harvest blood and death

By Julián Ortega Martínez
31 July 2006 15:32 COT
Filed under:

The original Spanish-version of this article was published in equinoXio

On a quite balanced -in my opinion- column (well, balanced for the American regular columnist standards), named In Lebanon, Echoes of Iraq?, Nicholas D. Kristof says:

Israelis are brimming with moral clarity, as we Americans were after 9/11. And they’re right: the Hezbollah attacks on Israel were particularly contemptible because they followed Israeli withdrawals from both Lebanon and Gaza. Israel should have been rewarded for those withdrawals, not subjected to rocket attacks and cross-border incursions.

These and other are the reasons because some Israelis (and pro-Jewish) justify such dreadful crimes as this Sunday’s massacre in Qana, where 34 children and 10 women died under the bombs sent by Ehud Olmert’s government, who’s earning enough merits to exceed Ariel Sharon’s bloody legacy. Had Israel the right to self-defence? Of course it had, and I agree with Kristof in that it deserved to be rewarded for the Gaza and South Lebanon withdrawals as an action for peace. Nevertheless, one should ask if the kidnappings of several soldiers by the Hamas and Hezbollah murderers and terrorists justify the deaths of hundreds of civilians in Lebanon, including a lot of foreigners? Wasn’t it an overreaction? Here Kristof strikes again when he states that "the first rule in foreign policy, as in medicine, should be “Do no harm.”" Such a wise quote. Even Americans, Israel allies, feel in a terribly uncomfortable position. The same applies for some people who self proclaim "leftist" and, because of a simple coincidence in their hate for US, condemn Israel but doesn’t do the same with Hamas and Hezbollah killers. The angry reactions of Spanish right-wing and, of course, from Israeli ambassador in Madrid are justified.

For centuries, specially during the last 58 years, after the founding of the State of Israel, Arabs and Israelis have promoted the hate for each other. This feeling, based in the fact that both people seem to "not to fit" in the same territory, the resentment of some Israelis after the Nazi Holocaust, and the Palestinian claims, have unleashed several conflicts within that time, whose results generate deep-seated grudges between these people with ancestral roots in this fertile region (once with vegetation, today with oil). Those feelings get worse because of the Israel-US alliance and the rising and consolidation of the Islamist extremist armed groups, which put hate and religion together in order to kill, justify themselves and gain popularity, as well as the support that certain goverments (as Ahmadinejad’s) provide to these organizations. A spiral of death that will unleash a bigger magnitude conflict for sure.

Everything we’ve seen in the Middle East for the last several years have been blood, death and destruction, result of  such awful emotions as hate, grudge and the wish of revenge. The Israelis and Palestinians’ rights to have their respective states seem not to be able to coexist in the same space and in the same time. It is a phenomenon so complex that its solution seems more distant everyday. Even children are urged to perpetuate these bad feelings and even music cannot escape this arrogant confrontation. Things this way, as long as Arabs (including Palestinians) and Israelis keep promoting the visceral hate for each other, there will be never peace in the Middle East.

Related articles (at equinoXio, in Spanish):

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

Creative Commons Licence

Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?